Monday, October 14, 2013

Measuring Investment Performance

There are several ways to measure the return achieved on an investment and it is important to understand what each measure is telling you. Let’s use a basic example.  At the beginning of year 1 you deposit $100,000 with a portfolio manager.  At the end of year 1 you have a balance of $110,000 before withdrawals.  You decide to withdraw $20,000 at the end of year 1 leaving $90,000 invested.  At the end of year 2 you have a balance of $94,500.  How did you do?

Holding Period Return
One of the simplest measures of performance is a holding period return which compares your ending wealth to your beginning wealth adjusted for withdrawals.  In this case, your holding period return for the two years combined is 14.5% (($94,500+20,000-100,000)/$100,000).

You can compute the holding period return for each year individually as follows:

Year 1               10% (($90,000 +20,000-100,000)/100,000)
Year 2                 5% (($94,500-90,000)/90,000)

Note that the holding period return for the two years of 14.5% is different than if you summed the two years individual holding period returns.  This is because a different amount was invested in each of those years.

Arithmetic Average Return
The arithmetic average return is the simple average of the year’s returns (the sum of the holding period returns divided by the number of years). The arithmetic average for this example is 7.5%.

Geometric Average Returns
A geometric return is a better measure of the performance of a portfolio over time.  There are two types of geometric returns: an internal rate of return and a time-weighted return. 

The internal rate of return is calculated using a financial calculator of computer and considers the value in each period as well as deposits and withdrawals.  It measures the compound average return achieved by the investor.  For this example the internal rate of return is 7.72%.  Note that this exceeds the simple average in this case.  The reason is that you (the investor) withdrew part of you funds after the high return year and had fewer funds invested in the lower return year.  In hindsight this was a good decision.

That decision to withdraw should not be reflected in the portfolio managers return.  The time-weighted return computes a geometric average which removes the impact of deposits and withdrawals.  In this example the time-weighted return would be 7.2%.  So the portfolio manager is responsible for a compound average return of 7.2%.  The investor, however, earned 7.72% considering the timing of the withdrawal.

Risk Adjusted Returns
It is also useful to consider the return generated by a portfolio relative to its risk.  One measure could simply be the average return divided by the standard deviation of returns, or return relative to risk.  The higher this ratio the more return was generated per unit of risk.  A popular metric is the Sharpe ratio which subtracts the risk free rate from the portfolio average return before dividing by the standard deviation.  The Sharpe ratio measures the excess return per unit of risk.  A higher positive number is desirable (Sharpe ratios must be computed for a portfolio and benchmark for the same period to see which is higher).